SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 178

J.S.VERMA, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
C. U. Shah, Bombay – Respondent


(1) THIS appeal by special leave is by the Revenue against rejection by the High court of its application made under Section 256(2 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for requiring the reference of a question of law, said to arise out of the b tribunals order. The question is as under :

"WHETHER, in the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the amount of Rs. 35,000.00 received by the assessee towards goodwill on his retirement from the partnership is not liable to tax under the head capital gain?"

(2) IN COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v B.C. Srinivasa Setty this court has held that the goodwill generated in a newly commenced business cannot be described as an asset within the terms of Section 45 and, therefore, its transfer is not subject to income tax under the head "capital gains". Following that decision this appeal must fail.

(3) CONSEQUENTLY the appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top