SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1108

A.S.ANAND, M.K.MUKHERJEE
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Bira Singh – Respondent


(1) THE respondents were tried by the learned Judge, Special court for an offence under Section 302, Indian Penal Code for an occurrence which took place on 13/4/1984 resulting in the death of Amarjit Singh. The trial court after appraisal of the evidence acquitted Amar Singh and Gurdev Singh, Respondents 2 and 3, but convicted Bira Singh, Respondent 1 for an offence under Section 304 Part II Indian Penal Code after acquitting him of the offence under Section 302 Indian Penal Code. Keeping in view the age of Bira Singh (then 18 years) the trial court, however, gave him the benefit of the Probation of Offenders Act and directed him to furnish a bond in the sum of Rs. 1,000.00 with one surety in the like amount to keep peace, be of good behaviour and to attend the court as and when called upon to do so for a period of two years. The State of Punjab being aggrieved of the order of the learned Judge, Special court dated 28/2/1985 has come up in appeal.

(2) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties, whereas Bira Singh. Respondent I when examined under Section 313 Criminal Procedure Code admitted having caused an injury to the deceased Amarjit Singh, Amar Singh and Gur




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top