B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, S.P.BHARUCHA
Commissioner Of Income Tax(Additional) , Lucknow – Appellant
Versus
Jeevan Lal Sah – Respondent
(1) THESE appeals are preferred by the Revenue against the judgment of the Allahabad High court answering the question in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. These appeals are preferred on a certificate granted by the High court and the only question in respect of which the certificate is granted is:
"WHETHER on the facts and circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in holding that no penalty could be imposed with reference to the cash deposits on the principle of Anwar Ali case even after the amendment of Section 271 in 1964."
(2) THE assessment years concerned herein are 1962-63, 1963-64, 1965-66, 1966-67 and 1967-68. The assessee is an individual running a tea-stall in Nainital. The returns filed by him were not accepted and assessment completed on best judgment. Subsequently, certain information came in possession of the Department which indicated concealment of income in respect of those years. A 1 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. Anwar Ali, 1970 2 SCC 185 : 76 ITR 696 notice under Section 148 was issued to the assessee in response to which he filed revised returns. In the revised returns, he disclosed the interest received by him on certai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.