SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 768

N.M.KASLIWAL, P.B.SAWANT, KULDIP SINGH
President Of India – Appellant
Versus
Death Of Sawinder Singh Grover, Re – Respondent


(1) RE : Death of Sawinder Singh Grover We have perused the report of the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi. In the conclusions he has summed up the report as under:

(I) Shri Nandays deposition contained in para 8 of his affidavit filed before Honble Supreme court regarding the circumstances leading to the death of Sawinder Singh does not appear to be truthful. It was certainly not a suicidal jump by Sawinder Singh, as propounded in the affidavit of Shri Nanday.

--- *** ---

(II) It is not possible to say precisely what went on inside room leading to the incident. There is strong suspicion of some misfeasance including torture on the part of Shri Narang and Shri Jaswant Singh whose accounts in this regard are unworthy of credit.

(III) The Officers of the Directorate had wrongfully confined Kanhiya Singh, Waryam Singh, Ram Saran and Surinder Singh in the office of the Directorate after the incident till their departure at about 4.15 a.m.

It is not disputed that the matter has not as yet been finally investigated. The learned Attorney-General assisting us in this case states that he does not accept the findings of the report and he reserves his right to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top