SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 211

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.P.BHARUCHA
D. Sankaranarayanan – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent


(1) THIS is an appeal by special leave by the landlord of premises situated at Door No. 29, Car Street, Ambasamvdram, Tamil Nadu. The appellant is a doctor and conducts a clinic on the ground floor of the building on the first floor of which the respondent is a tenant. The landlord called upon the tenant to vacate the first floor as he wanted the additional accommodation for the purposes of expanding his clinic. The petition in this behalf was filed under the provisions of Section 10(3(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. The eviction petition was dismissed. The landlord thereupon filed an appeal which, upon consideration of the facts on the record, was allowed. The tenant thereupon filed a revision petition before the High court at Madras and the revision petition was allowed, where against this appeal is filed.

(2) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties and read the judgment under appeal and other relevant papers. We are of the view that learned counsel for the appellant is right when he contends that the revision petition was treated by the High court as if it were a second appeal and, upon a reassessment of the evidence, the f


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top