SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 868

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, G.N.RAY
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Dev Dutt Kaushal – Respondent


Advocates:
ANIS AHMED, D.V.Sehgal, G.K.BANSAL, M.K.Dua, Monika Arora, R.K.KAPOOR, SANJAY BANSAL, SANJIV ANAND, SHRISH MISHRA, UJAGAR SINGH

B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.

(1) LEAVE granted in special leave petitions.

(2) A common question arises in this batch of appeals. For the sake of convenience, we may state the facts in Civil No. 1102 of 1995 (State of Punjab v. Prof. Dev Dutt Kaushal, (Lecturer), the facts of which case alone were placed before us as representative of the facts in other appeals.

(3) THE respondent joined a private educational institution, M.R. College, Fazilka, as a lecturer on 26/11/1956. After one year, his services were confirmed. .His date of birth is 29/10/1931. According to the conditions of service obtaining in the said private educational institution, the age of retirement was fixed at sixty years which could be extended up to sixty-five years in certain situations. The said college was taken over by the State government on 30/6/1983 and since then is being run as a government college. The respondent was continued in service after such take-over. On 31/10/1989, he was retired from service on attaining the age of fifty-eight years which is the age of superannuation prescribed under the government rules. Since his service under the government was less than ten yea




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top