SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1290

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Babu Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


(1) THOUGH the appellants, three in number along with Lila Singh, stood trial under Sections 307/34 Indian Penal Code and other ancillary offences, the trial court convicted them under S. 324/34 Indian Penal Code for having caused injuries to Kaur Singh, Jiwan Singh and Harbans Singh, PWs. On appeal by the Stale, however, the conviction was altered. All the four accused were convicted under Section 307/ 34 Indian Penal Code but Lila Singh substantially for the offence under Section 307 Indian Penal Code, and were imposed sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment. On joint special leave petition to this court, Lila Singh was declined leave whereas the appellants were granted, in view of the judgment and order of the High court, applying Section 34 Indian Penal Code.

(2) WE have heard learned counsel. The injury from which murderous assault could be spell out was attributed to Lila Singh. The other injuries on the injured persons were simple in nature. It is difficult, in the facts and circumstances of this case, to conclude that all the four accused had common intention of murderous assault on the PWs. It can otherwise be spelt out that they had a common intention b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top