SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 110

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Ponnuswamy – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


(1) THE verdict of the three courts below is similar in convicting and keeping maintained the convictions of the appellant under Sections 489-B and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. The case of the prosecution against the appellant is that he had purchased paddy from a peasant on payment of 130 forged currency notes of Rs. 100.00 denomination, On the arrest of the appellant, further forged currency notes were alleged to have been found in his possession for which he had to face a trial separately. All the same. the appellant had no explanation to offer as to wherefrom had he obtained those forged currency notes. Silence on the part of the appellant in such circumstances would by itself be a telling circumstance which would weigh against him in the consideration of the prosecution evidence led against him. In these circumstances, we are of the view that the convictions recorded deserve no alteration and equally there is no scope for reduction of sentence. Maintaining the convictions and sentences of the appellant, we dismiss this appeal.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top