SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 899

FAIZAN UDDIN, KULDIP SINGH
Housing Board, Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Housing Board Colony Welfare Association – Respondent


Advocates:
CHANDRA SHEKHAR ASHRI, Indu Malhotra, M.CHANDRASEKHRAN, S.M.Ashri, Shirin Jain

JUDGMENT

FAIZAN UDDIN, J. - Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. The appellant Housing Board is a statutory body constituted for the purposes of providing cheap and economical housing facilities. The land for construction of tenements is provided by Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter HUDA) which is also a statutory body. The land is acquired by the appellant-Board from HUDA under stipulation with regard to enhancement in the price of the land consequent upon judicial pronouncement. The appellant-Board invited applications for allotment of houses/flats from the economically weaker section, belonging to LIG/MIG category. The appellant-Board issued allotment letters to various applicants specifically mentioning in clause (9) of the allotment letters that as a result of the land award or arbitration proceedings, etc. if there is an increase in the cost, the Board may enhance the price of the dwelling houses/flats allotted to them. This condition was reiterated in clause 2(W) of the Hire Purchase Tenancy Agreement (Form A) entered into under Section 11(4) of the Housing Board, Haryana (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenements) Regulations, 1972. It was also provided tha















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top