SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 897

K.RAMASWAMY, B.L.HANSARIA
Ram Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
S.N.TERDAL, SHASHI KIRAN SHETTY, Shyam Babu

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant, while working as constable under the charge of Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central District, New Delhi, was charged with twofold grave misconduct : (i) while he was in charge of the sub-jail (naib court) he facilitated one Puran, s/o Rama, undertrial prisoner, to drink alcohol before being taken to the Court; and (ii) he had abused the superior officer and created an ugly scene in their presence. The inquiry officer in his report dated 20-7-1985 found that the second charge was partly proved and the first charge had not been proved. The disciplinary authority, viz., Additional Deputy Commissioner, disagreeing with the conclusions reached by the inquiry officer, issued a show-cause notice on 16-8-1985 as to why both the charges should not be taken to have been proved. The appellant submitted his explanation and thereon by order dated 6-9-1986, the Additional Deputy Commissioner dismissed him from service. After unsuccessful appeal and revision, he approached the Central Administrative Tribunal in May 1986. The Tribunal in its order dated 17-9-1990 dismissed the OA. Thus this appeal by special leave.

3. Mr. Shyam Babu, the learn














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top