SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1117

FAIZAN UDDIN, S.C.AGRAWAL, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
T. C. Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. In this writ petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution the grievance of the petitioner, T. C. Pathak, is that his son Nirdesh Pathak alias Neetu was forcibly taken away by Respondents 4 and 5 and some constables from his shop on 25-8-1994 at about 10.00 a.m. and that his whereabouts are not known. The petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the said Nirdesh before this Court. After a notice was issued on the said writ petition to Respondents 3, 4 and 5, Nirdesh Pathak alias Neetu was presented in the court on 19-9-1994. A counter-affidavit has been filed by Shri K. L. Meena, Senior Superintendent of Police, Bulandshahr wherein it has been stated that upon receipt of the notices issued by this Court the deponent in his capacity as Senior Superintendent of Police, Bulandshahr had ordered an enquiry into the matter of alleged illegal detention of Nirdesh Pathak alias Neetu at Police Station, Jehangirabad and the said enquiry was conducted by Rama Nand, Additional Superintendent of Police, Bulandshahr. As per the enquiry report dated 6-9-1994, Nirdesh Pathak was brought by Sub-Inspector, Sukrant Sharma (Respo




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top