SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 354

R.M.SAHAI, G.N.RAY
Kulwant Singh Alias Kanta, S/o Piara Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


(1) THE appellant was tried and convicted under Section 5 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000.00 in default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months.

(2) THE appellant was arrested on 17/5/1990. a pistol is said to have been recovered from him along with two cartridges. The prosecution examined Sub-Inspector Shamsher Singh, Public Witness 4, and Inspector Jaspal Singh, Public Witness 5, to prove the prosecution case. Their testimony was believed by the Designated Court.

(3) WE have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State of Punjab. It is not necessary for us to discuss the evidence of Public Witness 4 and Public Witness 5 as from the evidence of Public Witness 2, Sham Sunder, Head Constable and armourer, it is not established that the cartridges were sent to him for testing. And as regards pistol there is no material to show that it was sealed at the time of search. The investigation thus suffered from serious infirmity.

(4) IN these circumstances, the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top