SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 990

FAIZAN UDDIN, N.P.SINGH
J. K. Jain – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
ANANT PALLI, ARUN JAITLEY, Atul Sharma, E.C.AGARWAL, G.L.SANGHI, MAHESH AGRAWAL, PUMIMA BHATT, V.B.SAHARYA

JUDGMENT

N.P. SINGH, J.

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE appellants have questioned the validity of the order, passed by the High court, rejecting the claim of the appellants that there was no agreement between the appellants and the respondent - Delhi Development Authority, (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent") to refer the dispute between them to an arbitrator.

(3) APPELLANT 4 - M/s Jain Rolling Mills is a registered partnership firm and Appellant 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the appellant") is the Managing Partner. The respondent issued a notice inviting tenders for supply of Steel bars of various diameters to the extent of 20,000.00 mt. tonnes. The appellant obtained a tender form from the said respondent on 16/11/1982. The tender was submitted along with a covering letter dated 18/11/1983. After negotiations, the tender was accepted only for supply of 10.000 mt. tonnes of steel bars of various diameters. A formal agreement was executed. Thereafter some dispute arose between the parties and it appears that the respondent vide its letter dated 23/10/1984 rescinded and annulled the contract for the balance quantity of 3513.385 tonnes. The e



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top