SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1029

S.B.MAJMUDAR, S.P.BHARUCHA, FAIZAN UDDIN
Shersingh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.MARIAPUTHAM, Ajay Kapur, ARUNA MATHUR, AVTAR SINGH, B.K.PRASAD, K.L.LAHIRI, R.ANAND PADMANABHAN, R.VENKATARAMANA, SATYA MITRA GARG

JUDGMENT

FAIZAN UDDIN, J.

(1) THE short question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the appellants who are qualified Librarians employed in the University of Delhi and its constituent colleges in different grades are entitled to parity in the pay scales between the professional library staff and the teaching staff of the University of Delhi and its colleges recognised and established since January 1961

(2) THE appellants case is that in the year 1957 the University Grants Commission constituted a Committee appointed by University Grants Commission, Respondent 2 under the Chairmanship of Dr S.R. Ranganathan. The said Committee recommended that the status and the salary scales of the library staff should be the same as that of the teaching and research staff. Further case of the appellants is that in the year 1961 University Grants Commission, Respondent 2 took decision to give effect to the aforesaid recommendations of Ranganathan Committee. Consequently, Respondent 2 conveyed its decision to the University of Delhi, Respondent 3 by its letter dated 18/1/1961 that professionally qualified library staff are for purposes of salary revi






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top