SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 889

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
C. L. Jain Woollen Mills – Respondent


(1) WHILE we agree with Mr. A Subba Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner, that when the appeal before the tribunal, preferred by the assessee himself, was pending, the High court ought not to have interfered in the matter by way of a writ petition, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The S.L.P. is dismissed. We leave the questions arising in the matteropen.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top