B.L.HANSARIA, G.N.RAY
Krishnan Kakkanth – Appellant
Versus
Government Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.N. RAY, J.
(1) LEAVE granted.
(2) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. The constitutional validity of the circular dated 19-5-1995 issued by the secretary to the government of Kerala directing that for distribution of pumpsets under Comprehensive Coconut Development Programme and other similar schemes of the Agriculture Department and in order to streamline the implementation of the schemes specifying specific roles and responsibilities for different agencies involved, M/s Kerala Agro Industries Corporation (KAICO) and Regional Agro Industries Development Corporation (RAIDCO) would arrange supply of pumpsets in the districts of Kesarkoda, Kanner, Vyanad, Kozhikode, Malaopuram, Palekkad, Trissur and Kottayam and in the remaining districts, supply will be effected by private dealers along with KAICO and RAIDCO, since challenged by the appellants in OP No. 16115 of 1995, but upheld by the impugned judgment of the High court dated 7/2/1996 is in question in this appeal. Such writ petition was disposed by a common judgment along with other writ petitions being OAs Nos. 13936 and 14454 of 1995. In the said other writ petitions, the constitutional
relied on : Viklad Coal Merchant v. Union of India
referred to : Kharak Singh v. State of U.P.
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
relied on : Saghir Ahmad v. State of U.P.
Laxmi Khandsari v. State of U.P.
D.K. Trivedi and Sons v. State of Gujarat
Harakcliand Ratanchand Banthia v. Union of India
Parbhani Transport Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Regional Transport Authority
Shree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.