B.N.KIRPAL, K.RAMASWAMY
Kashi Ram Namdeo Zambro – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
ORDER
1. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the Act) was published in the State Gazette on 16-1-1975, acquiring certain extent of land part of which land belonged to the appellant for construction of Panzar Talaw. The Collector made his award under Section 11 on 15-11-1977. Notice of award as required under Section 12 was served on the appellant on 17-11-1977. On an objection raised, the appellant made good the deficit court fee. Thereafter, the Collector made the reference to the civil court. During the reference proceedings, the counsel appearing for the State raised a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of the reference which was upheld since requisite court fee was not paid within the limitation of six weeks from the date of the receipt of the notice of the award, as required under clause (b) of proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 18. On appeal, the High Court upheld the contention by judgment dated 27-4-1982 to 29-4-1982 and accordingly dismissed the appeal. Thus this appeal by special leave against the decree of the Bombay High Court.
2. The only question that arises for consideration is whether the claimant is required
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.