SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B L Hansaria, K Ramaswamy, S B Majmudar
SECTOR-6, BAHADURGARH PLOT HOLDERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeal No. 2347 of 1981 (From the Judgment and Order dated 17-10-1980 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in C.W.P. No. 2415 of 1980) with I. As. Nos. 1 and 2 of 1991, decided on 6th December, 1995.
Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act - Section 3 - Pay instalments including interest on total price of plot - Delivery of possession of plots - An offer was accordingly made for freehold sale of about plots on first come first serve basis in Sector estate - Applicants were informed that all modern amenities like underground sewerage storm water drainage road electricity supply of potable water etc - Provided - Pursuant to this invitation number of persons some of whom are members of appellant - Association applied for allotment - Appellant Jet one such applicant and by memo of even number Estate Officer Faridabad informed Ram about allotment of residential to him on terms and conditions mentioned in memo – Held, Court do not propose to leave matter at this - Allotments having been made about two decades ago there can be no justification in not fully developing plots even - Statement in that sector is almost fully developed and that temporary disposal has been completed do speak about lack of proper interest and attention on part of respondents - In this connection we would state that statement had been made on behalf of respondents before this Court on that possession of developed plots would be given t appellants within period of six month san so such direction was given - States that direction is yet to be complied with in letter and spirit - It is complaint which has given rise to Contempt Petition - On facts and circumstances of case court do not propose to pursue contempt application and would direct respondent once again to develop sector fully and not almost fully - This would be done within period of six months failing which respondents would not only be liable for contempt but allotters would be exonerated from liability to pay any interest whatsoever – Appeal disposed
JUDGMENT
HANSARIA, J. - Bahadurgarh was declared as an urban estate by the State Government of Haryana in exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 of the Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964 (hereinafter the Punjab Act). The declaration of any area to be "urban estate", permits the State Government, inter alia, to sell the sites in accordance with the Punjab Urban Estates (Sales of Sites) Rules, 1965 (for short "the Punjab Rules"). An offer was accordingly made for freehold sale of about 2200 plots on first come first serve basis in Sector No. 6 of the estate. Applicants were informed that "all modern amenities like underground sewerage, storm water, drainage, roads, electricity, supply of potable water etc. will be provided". Pursuant to this invitation, a number of persons, some of whom are the members of appellant-Association, applied for allotment. Appellant 2, Jeet Ram, is one such applicant and by memo of even number dated 9-8-1972, the Estate Officer, Faridabad informed Jeet Ram about the allotment of residential plot No. 852 to him on terms and conditions mentioned in the memo. (Similar is the position qua other allotees). We are concerned with conditions 4 and 5 which read as below :
"4. In case, you accept this allotment, you should send the enclosed acceptance in the form given at Annexure A to this letter together with a bank draft for Rs. 750 in order to make 29 per cent of the price of the above-mentioned plot within 30 days from the date of issue of this allotment order, the payment shall be made by a bank draft payable to the Estate Officer, Faridabad, and drawn on the State Bank of India, Faridabad. In case of failure to deposit the said amount within the above specified period, the allotment shall be cancelled and the deposit of 10 per cent earnest money paid with the application shall be forfeited against which you will have no claim.
5. The balance of 80 per cent tentative price can be paid lump sum without interest within 60 days from date of issue of this allotment letter or in the annual equated instalments with 7 per cent interest as laid down in Rule No. 12 framed under Section 23(2)(b)(3)(3) of the Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964. The first instalment shall fall due after the expiry of one year from the date of issue of this allotment order."
2. As per condition 5 aforesaid, the first instalment become due on 9-8-1973, that is, after expiry of one year from the date of issue of the allotment order. On the instalment not having been paid, Respondent, 2, the Estate Officer, sent notices to the members of the appellant-Association to pay the instalments including 7% interest on the total price of the plot. Failing which, it was stated, that action under Section 10 of the Punjab Act would be taken which visualises resumption and forfeiture. The members of the Association acted as required by the notices but without actually taking possession of the plots. It was so because the plots had not been developed as visualised by the advertisement seeking applications. Various representations were made to Respondent 2 for early development and for delivering the possession of the plots. It was also represented that the members of the Association were being charged interest without actual delivery of possession of the plots which according to the members was not permissible.
3. Despite the aforesaid representations, as the plots were not developed, Appellant 2 approached the High Court of Punjab and Haryana by invoking its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court has held in the impugned order that interest was chargeable. As regards possession, the following observation was made in para 4 :
"4. As regards possession, it may be noticed that the stand of the respondents was that development is still taking place and as soon as the development is completed, possession of the plot would be offered to Petitioner 1. It was further stated at t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.