SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1281

S.B.MAJMUDAR, B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Sector 6, Bahadurgarh Plot Holders Association – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Indu Malhotra, S.SRINIVASA VARMA, Y.P.RAO

JUDGMENT

HANSARIA, J. - Bahadurgarh was declared as an urban estate by the State Government of Haryana in exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 of the Punjab Urban Estates (Development and Regulation) Act, 1964 (hereinafter the Punjab Act). The declaration of any area to be "urban estate", permits the State Government, inter alia, to sell the sites in accordance with the Punjab Urban Estates (Sales of Sites) Rules, 1965 (for short "the Punjab Rules"). An offer was accordingly made for freehold sale of about 2200 plots on first come first serve basis in Sector No. 6 of the estate. Applicants were informed that "all modern amenities like underground sewerage, storm water, drainage, roads, electricity, supply of potable water etc. will be provided". Pursuant to this invitation, a number of persons, some of whom are the members of appellant-Association, applied for allotment. Appellant 2, Jeet Ram, is one such applicant and by memo of even number dated 9-8-1972, the Estate Officer, Faridabad informed Jeet Ram about the allotment of residential plot No. 852 to him on terms and conditions mentioned in the memo. (Similar is the position qua other allotees). We are concerned with condi





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top