K.RAMASWAMY, B.L.HANSARIA
Municipal Committee. Karnal – Appellant
Versus
Nirmala Devi – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. An area admeasuring 4 ft. x 6-1/2 ft. situated in Chaura Bazar near Rai Saheb Jogiwara, Karnal is claimed to belong to the respondent. The appellant asserted it to be part of a public street. They found that the respondent had constructed a shop on the said portion of a public street. Consequently, they issued a notice, after inspection, for demolition of the shop. Since the respondent did not demolish the shop, the appellant got the construction demolished necessitating the respondent to file the suit for damages. The trial court dismissed the suit by decree dated 15-11-1990. On appeal, the Additional District Judge by judgment and decree dated 29-10-1993 reversed the decree of the trial court and granted damages for a sum of Rs. 20,000. The High Court in Second Appeal No. 173 of 1994 by order dated 24-1-1994 dismissed the appeal as usual in limine, which in the recent past is getting changed by giving reasons which one hopes shall become a rule. Thus this appeal by special leave.
3. The only question is whether the aforestated disputed area is public street. Section 2(23) of the Haryana Municipalities Act, 1973 (for short, the Act), defines street thus
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.