SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1165

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Amita Kaushish – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kaushish – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Chadha, Indra Sawhney, K.J.JOHN, KAPIL SIBAL, RISHI KESH

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The impugned order is only a direction to list the appeal FAO (OS) No. 221 of 1991 filed by the appellants for disposal pending in the High Court. The Division Bench by its order dated 12-7-1994 directed to list the appeal for final hearing on 17-10-1994 within first five cases. It would appear that there is long drawn litigation inter se parties. Since the time fixed by the High Court is already over and the appeal is yet to be disposed of, we request the High Court to appropriately fix an early date for disposal, preferably before the end of this year.

3. The learned counsel for the respondents stated that on account of the stay of the suit, his clients are prevented to take any direction or order by way of interlocutory application. The stay of the trial of the suit does not preclude the respondents to seek such appropriate interlocutory reliefs as may be available and warranted in the facts and circumstances.

4. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top