SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 233

KULDIP SINGH, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Canara Bank – Appellant
Versus
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation – Respondent


ORDER

The question before the Full Bench of the Gujarat High Court was whether municipal tax paid directly by the tenant to the Corporation can be included in the annual letting value as defined by Section 2(1-A) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 for the purpose of computing gross rateable value of the rented premises for the purpose of levying property tax by the Corporation under the Act. The appellants contention was that such directly paid tax by the tenant could not be taken into consideration to swell the annual letting value for the purpose of the property tax. The Corporation contended to the contrary. The Full Bench of the High Court rejected the contention of the appellants and accepted the contention of the Corporation. We have been taken through the judgment of the High Court. We see no infirmity in the same. We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions reached therein. The appeals are dismissed with no costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top