SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1182

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Rajpal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Indu Malhotra, Mahinder Singh Dahiya, S.M.HEGDE KADAVE, SURUCHI AGARWAL

ORDER

1. Delay condoned.

2. Leave granted.

3. In view of the order passed by this Court in SLPs (C) Nos. 3099-3100 of 1985 and batch, the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken into service and their services have been regularised. Under these circumstances, since the appellant, who is the only person left out in the field, also stands in the same position, we think, on this special circumstance, he is also entitled to the same relief.

4. The appeal is accordingly allowed. But the appellant would not be entitled to the back wages; he would, however, get all other consequential benefits. The respondents are directed to take the appellant into service within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top