SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 165

J.S.VERMA, K.S.PARIPOORNAN
Commissioner Of Gift Tax, Madras – Appellant
Versus
C. Muth Kumarswamy Mudaliar – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal by the Revenue is by a certificate granted by the High Court. The question of law referred to the High Court for its decision was as under :

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that Section 17(1)(a) of the Gift tax Act, 1958, as amended by the Gift Tax Amendment Act, 1962, would not apply to the levy of penalty in this case ?"

2. The High Court answered the question against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. This has given rise to the present appeal.

3. The material facts are only a few. The last date for filing the return under the Gift Tax Act by the assessee was 30-6-1962. The assessee filed the return on 22-10-1963. The assessment was completed on 31-3-1964 and a notice was issued to the assessee to show cause why penalty should not be imposed in terms of Section 17(1)(a) of the Act failure to file the return within the prescribed period. The assessee gave the reply on 29-4-1964. The Gift Tax Officer imposed a penalty of Rs 2605, which was reduced on appeal by the Commissioner to Rs 1000. Thereafter the Tribunal took the view that the question of imposition of penalty in this case will be gov



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top