SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Kuldip Singh, N Venkatachala
ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS
VERSUS
BRAHAMA PUTRA STEELS (P) LTD. AND OTHERS, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeal No. ... of 1995 (Arising out of SLP No. 5000 of 1994), decided on April 26, 1995.
Constitution of India, 1950 - Commercial production - Electricity charges to ASEB as well as current charges - Authority to reimburse subsidy was Branch of Directorate Industries Government of Assam - Industries entitled to subsidy were to be given same for period of years from date setting up of industry – Respondent industry was set up sometime in July and as such entitlement of industry was up to July - It is case industry that no subsidy was paid till December and as such writ petition was filed in High Court in March direction to State of Assam to pay subsidy in terms Policy – Held, Court have heard counsel for parties - Bare reading of Policy statement reproduced above shows that grant of subsidy to an industry was not linked with payment of electricity charges by industry to Board - Industry is contractual as well as statutory obligation to pay charges to Board in respect of electricity consumed - If there was any delay in payment of subsidy that would not be ground for industry to withhold electricity charges - Court are of view that High Court fell into patent error in linking grant of subsidy with payment electricity charges - Neither contents of interim orders granted by High Court on nor concept of legitimate expectations of industry to get subsidy can be validly made ground for linking payment of electricity charges surcharge with receipt of subsidy Policy – Court therefore set aside above-quoted part of High Court judgment and direction given by High Court quoted above - Court allow writ petition to above extent - This Court therefore modified judgment of High Court in above quoted terms - It would therefore be in interest of justice that no prejudice in shape of payment of surcharge be permitting to be caused industry from – Court therefore direct Electricity Board not to levy any surcharge for period form - At this stage counsel for State of Assam has very fairly stated that balance of subsidy due to industry shall be paid within months from today – Petition disposed
ORDER
1. Special leave granted.
2. The Government of Assam introduced an Industrial Policy called "Industrial Policy of Assam 1986" (the Policy). The Policy provided power subsidy in the following terms :
"Power subsidy
Power subsidy will be granted as follows :
With regard to the small-scale sector, power subsidy will be granted to the extent of 50% for the first five years of commercial production. There will be no ceiling to the subsidy amount which can be availed of by the small-scale sector.
Subsidy on drawal of power lines :
For the SSI units 50% of the cost incurred on drawal of Electrical Power Line, from the main line to the factory sheds, will be subsidised up to a ceiling of Rs 20,000 for each industrial unit.
Power subsidy :
(a) Power subsidy will be granted as follows :
With regard to the small-scale sector, power subsidy will be granted to the extent of 50% for the first five years of commercial production. There will be no ceiling to the subsidy amount which can be availed of by the small-scale sector.
(b) * * *
(c) Power subsidy will be allowed on actual consumption of power for manufacturing process in respect of the small-scale sector, power actually consumed by the units, except that used for residential purpose will be subsidised.
(d) Existing units undertaking expansion/diversification will also be eligible for power concession for the expanded/diversified part of their activities.
Reimbursement of the subsidy amount will be done directly by the Udyog Sahayak on a quarterly basis."
3. The authority to reimburse the subsidy was Udyog Sahayak, a Branch of the Directorate of the Industries, Government of Assam. The industries entitled to the subsidy were to be given the same for a period of 5 years from the date of the setting up of the industry. The respondent-industry was set up sometime in July 1988 and as such the entitlement of the industry was up to July 1993. It is the case of the industry that no subsidy was paid till December 1993 and as such a writ petition was filed in the High Court in March 1993 seeking a direction to the State of Assam to pay the subsidy in terms of the Policy. The writ petition came for motion hearing before the High Court on 31-3-1993, when the following order was passed :
"Post the petition for order on 26-4-1993 for consideration of the interim prayer. In the meantime, petitioner shall clear the bill dated 11-3-1993 amounting to Rs 6,27,708 within 7 days from today adjusting any amount if already paid by the petitioner against the said bill. It is directed that until further order electricity supply to the petitioner industry shall not be disconnected."
Thereafter the petition came for hearing before the High Court on 18-6-1993. The High Court passed the following order :
"Taking into consideration the hardship faced by the petitioner due to admitted failure on the part of the Government to pay the subsidy, for the ends of justice, in the interim, I direct that Government of Assam shall pay the arrear electricity charges to ASEB as well as current charges payable up to June 1993 within a period of one month from today and the ASEB will receive the payment from the Government. The petitioner, shall, however, be liable to pay the current bills raised for consumption of electricity on and from July 1993. Respondent ASEB is directed not to disconnect the supply of electricity to Petitioner 1 until further order."
4. The High Court finally allowed the writ petition and directed the State Government to pay the subsidy to the respondent-Company in terms of the Policy. Apart from the abovesaid direction, the High Court further held as under :
"The word subsidy means a grant of money made by the Government in aid of the promoters of any enterprise or work, and the expression reimburse means to pay back, to make restoration or to indemnify. Therefore, the petitioner-Company has to pay the energy charges to ASEB and then the Government has to pay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.