SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 970

G.B.PATTANAIK, K.RAMASWAMY
Attabira Regulated Market Committee – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Rice Mills – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. Though notice was sent to the respondent on 14-4-1992 till date neither acknowledgement nor unserved envelope has been received. Under these circumstances, the notice must be deemed to have been served on the respondent.

3. The only question is whether Saharatikira and Bheden are within the notified market area of the appellant? It is not in dispute that pursuant to the notification issued under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of Orissa Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1956, the Orissa Act 3 of 1957 (for short the Act) the State Government declared the notified market area with annexures thereto. Under Annexure A to the notification it was stated that the area falling within a radius of 8 kms from the plots specified in Schedule B are within the notified area. In Schedule B it was mentioned that the area comprising in Attabira and Bheden Police Stations in the District of Sambalpur are within the notified area, It is now seen that Villages Saharatikira and Bheden are situated within the 8-km radius from the aforesaid police stations. Under these circumstances, the villages do fall within the notified area.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top