SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 612

FAIZAN UDDIN, N.P.SINGH
Bonda Devesu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE sole appellant was convicted under Section 302 of the Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life by the trial court. The conviction and sentence awarded by the trial court was confirmed by the High court.

(3) THIS court issued notice to the respondent-State on 29/7/1993, on a limited question in respect of nature of the offence committed by the appellant. Pursuant to the said notice the respondent-State has appeared.

(4) FROM the judgment of the trial court, it appears that the prosecution case itself is that the deceased used to tell the wife of the appellant that he will carry her away and marry her. On 4/6/1989, at about 8 in the morning, the wife of the appellant had gone to fetch water from a water kundi. While the wife of the appellant was taking water the deceased caught hold of her hand and asked her to come with him. Somehow, she got herself released and ran away to her house and informed the appellant about the incident. The appellant went to the deceased and it is alleged that the appellant gave an axe blow to the deceased which proved fatal.

(5) THE prosecution had alleged part

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top