SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1263

G.N.RAY, G.T.NANAVATI
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Gurdip Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
AMITA GUPTA, P.K.JAIN, R.S.Suri, SUSHIL KUMAR

(1) CRIMINAL No. 919 of 1981 is directed against the judgment dated 29/5/1981 passed by the High court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal No. 604 of 1979. The said appeal was preferred by the respondents who were convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar on 23/4/1979, in Sessions Trial No. 11 of 1979 on a charge under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. The accused Kuldip Singh and his son Gurdip Kumar and his wife Darshan Kaur were convicted under Section 306 Indian Penal Code by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Kuldip Singh and Gurdip Kumar were sentenced to four years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500.00 in default to suffer further imprisonment for three months, but Darshan Kaur was sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 500.00 in default to suffer further imprisonment for three months.

(2) ACCORDING to the prosecution case, the deceased Jyoti Bala was given in marriage on 12/2/1978 at Arnritsar to accused Gurdip Kumar. but shortly after the said marriage, the deceased was ill-treated by the accused as the accused felt that proper dowry had not been given by the family of the deceased. It is also the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top