SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 681

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
KULDIP SINGH AND N. VENKATACHALA, JJ.
State of M.P. and others, Appellants
Versus
M/s. Birla Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Respondent.
WITH
M/s. Birla Jute Manufacturing Co. Ltd., and another, Petitioners
Versus State of M.P. and others, Respondents.
Civil Appeal No. 5507 of 1995, with Writ Petn. No. 2739 of 1985 (arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 8870 of 1982),
D/- 10-5-1995.

Advocates:
A.K.Sanghi, DARSHAN SINGH, S.K.AGNIHOTRI, Sakesh Kumar

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 136 – Quash levies and demands - Raw- material for manufacture of cement in the cement factory - State of Madhya Pradesh its Electrical Adviser and Regional Accounts Officer of the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board have filed the above Civil Appeal Article of Constitution of India impugning Division Bench judgment and order of High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Misc - wherein it has been held that the rate of duty payable on consumption of the electrical energy under the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty Act premises Birla Jute Manufacturing Company Limited - Mines Act Mines Act applied was required to be calculated under Item of Table to Section – Held, This proviso therefore expressly states that rates duty livable for electrical energy consumed by premises or purpose covered by more than one item it is the highest rate fixed under them which is livable where the consumer of electrical energy does not obtain the consent from the distribution of electrical energy or producer of electricity for change in such user - Hence according to the proviso if consent is obtained by the consumer of electrical energy from the distributor of energy or producer of electricity for using electrical energy in a premises of a factory covered by Item it cannot be used for premises covered under Item and if such thing is done without obtaining such consent instead of lower duty payable for premises covered under Item higher duty for premises covered under Item becomes payable - In other words proviso to Table requires that consumer of electrical energy must declare before such consumption as to the purpose for which it would be consumed in the sense whether it would be consumed for the purpose covered under Item or Item or Item or Item of the Table - The requirement of the proviso when is understood in the context of the provisions under different items the purpose for which electrical energy is consumed if falls under more than one item the rate at which duty becomes leviable would be of item for which highest rate of duty is fixed - Order accordingly

Judgement

VENKATACHALA, J. :- Special leave sought for in S. L. P. No. 8870 of 1982 is granted.

2. The State of Madhya Pradesh, its Electrical Adviser and Regional Accounts Officer of the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board, have filed the above Civil Appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, impugning a Division Bench judgment and order dated May 1, 1982 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Misc. Writ Petn No. 320/80, (reported in AIR 1982 Madh Pra 225), wherein it has been held that the rate of duty payable on consumption of the electrical energy under the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty Act, 1949 - "the 1949 Act" in premises of M/s. Birla Jute Manufacturing Company Limited - M/s. Birla Ltd." to which the Mines Act, 1952 - "the Mines Act" applied, was required to be calculated under Item (2) and not Item (1) of Table to Section 3 of the 1949 Act.

3. M/s. Birla Ltd. and its Director, Shri M. M. Gadodia, have filed the above writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, impugning the constitutionality of the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Duty (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1984 " the Validation Act" which amended certain provisions of the 1949 Act. validating duty levied on consumption of electrical energy imposed under the 1949 Act in respect of premises to which the Mines Act applied. Since questions argising for our consideration and decision in Civil Appeal and the Writ Petition relate to sustainability of levy imposed under the 1949 Act on electrical energy consumed in a premises to which the Mines Act applied, they could be disposed of together.

4. Facts which are material for a proper consideration of the questions arising for our decision in the said appeal and writ petition, could be stated thus :

M/s. Birla Ltd. has set up several industries all over the country for the manufacture and sale of consumable goods. One of such industries set up by M/s. Birla Ltd, is M/s. Satna Cement Works with lime-stone mines at one place and a cement factory at another place, in the State of Madhya Pradesh. Huge lime-stone boulders extracted from the mines known as dhokas are broken into small sized lim-stones known as gittis for being used as raw- material for manufacture of cement in the cement factory by a lime-stone crusher erected in a premises located at the mines-head of lime-stone mines to which the Mines Act applies. For the electrical energy consumed by the lime-stone crusher in that premises at mines-head during the year 1979-1980, the Government of Madhya Pradesh levied duty under Section 3 of the 1949 Act at a rate calculated under Item(1) of Table below that section and raised demands thereon, against M/s. Birla Ltd. Such levies and demands were refuted by M/s. Birla Ltd. by contending that it was liable for levy of duty on electrical energy consumed for breaking dhokas into gittis by the lime-stone crusher in the premises at mines-head only at a rate calculated in Item (2) of Table to Section 3 of the 1949 Act, notwithstanding the applicability of the Mines Act to the said premises, in the premises had to be regarded as a factory for fixing the rate of duty payable on electrical energy consumed therein because of inclusive meaning of factory given in Explanation (c) to Section 3 of the 1949 Act itself. Since the Government of Madhya Pradesh in its demands made against M/s. Birla Ltd., the latter filed a Writ Petition, Misc. W. P. No. 520 of 1980, (reported in AIR 1982 Madha Pra 225), in the Madhya Pradesh High Court challenging the said levies and demands. A Division Bench of the High Court taking the aid of Explanation (c) to Section 3 of the 1949 Act quashed the levies and demands challenged by M/s. Birla Ltd., by upholding the contention that its liability to pay duty was only at the rate calculated under Clause (2) of Table to Section 3 of the 1949 Act, by its judgment and order dated May 1, 1982 rendered in that writ petition. It is the correctness of that judgment and order which has b









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top