SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 873

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Hanmanta Daulappa Nimbal Since Deceased By His Heirs And Lrs. – Appellant
Versus
Babasaheb Dajisaheb Londhe – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.BHASME, S.K.AGNIHOTRI, V.N.GANPULE

JUDGMENT :- This appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the High Court at Bombay in Special Civil Application No. 277 of 1972 dated 8th September, 1977. The respondent-landlord filed Civil Suit No.10/68 in the Court of Civil Judge, J.D. at Akkalkot. Since the appellant raised plea of oral tenancy for the year 1968-69, the Civil Court referred the issue: "Does the defendant prove tenancy over the suit land thereon"? to the Tehsildar who in his proceedings held that in respect of Survey No.3 to the extent of 16 acres 26 Gunthas situated in Mirajgi village belongs to the respondent and the appellant had not proved oral tenancy. Thereon, the appellant carried the matter in appeal to the Special Deputy Collector, Tenancy Appeals, Sholapur, who held that oral tenancy was established. Even otherwise, the appellant is a deemed tenant under Section 4 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1946 (for short, "Tenancy Act"). On revision, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune, confirmed the findings. A writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution.

2. The learned Single Judge of the High Court, while holding that since the issue referred to the Tribunal under t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top