K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Virendranath – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :- Leave granted in the special leave petition. Tagged with Crl. Appeal No. 402 of 1994, which is already on Board.
2. The appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 402 of 1994 is the offender and the appellant in Criminal Appeal arising out of S. L. P. (Crl) No. 2859 of 1992 is the abetor. They stand convicted under Sections 7, 13(1) (d) read with Section 13(2) and under Section 7 read with Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
3. The prosecution case is that the complainant, P. W. I found a bundle of blankets and bed-sheets lying unclaimed on a road, which he carried to his house. A1 got scent of it and recovered the bundle and got the complaint to the police station. A1 demanded a bribe of Rs. 2,000/- from the complainant for not taken any action against him. After haggling, the demand was reduced to Rs. 500/-. Rs. 50/- was paid on an occasion later on 16-12-1985 at another place in Bazargaon, as the complainant to begin with had no money. The balance of Rs. 450/- was to be paid two days later. On the later date. the complainant went to the Anti-Corruption staff and laid a complaint to the afore-effect. Necessary formalities for organising a trap were made and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.