SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1246

G.N.RAY, G.T.NANAVATI
Krishna Pal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.PUNDIR, M.C.DHINGRA, P.K.Dev, PRAMOD SVARUP, RANI JETHMALANI

JUDGMENT :- These appeals are directed against the judgment dated March 24, 1993 passed by the High Court at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 3062/79 and Criminal Appeal No. 3247/79. Both the aforesaid appeals were preferred by the accused-appellants against their conviction and sentence passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Merrut in Sessions Trial No. 5/79 under Section 302 read with Sections 148 and 149 IPC and convicting the appellants for life imprisonment on the charge of murder and also convicting them under Section 148 IPC. The five appellants, namely, Trikha (A-1) his two sons, Sohanvir Pal (A-2) and Amar Pal (A-3) his brothers son. Krishana Pal(A-4) and Veerpal (A-5) also a relation to Trikha, were prosecuted under Section 302 read with sections 148 and 149 IPC for causing death of one Amar Pal on October 11, 1987 at about 12.30 P.M.

2. The prosecution case in short is that the family of the deceased Amar Pal and the family of Trikha had strained relations and there had been litigations between them. On October 11, 1978, when the deceased Amar Pal was suffering from headache he had been to the shop of Dr. Rajveer Singh (P.W.6). The said doctor after examinin








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top