SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 91

J.JAGANNADHA RAO, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar Jain – Respondent


(1) IN this appeal the appellant MCD is between the devil and the deep sea. This situation is of its own creation. respondent 1 at the relevant time was working as Non-Technical Staff (for short NTS) on muster-roll as daily- wager. He was appointed on 1/6/1978. At that time he was working under Delhi Development Authority (DDA) whose successor-in-interest is the present appellant, MCD. In the year 1981 he was alleged to have committed misconduct of persuading fellow workman Shri Mahender Kumar to interpolate the name of respondent 1 along with Mahender Kumars name in the list of recommended employees for regularisation in service. It appears that the appellants conducted a preliminary enquiry into this alleged misconduct of respondent 1 and Mahender Kumar and thereafter in the light of the proceedings in the preliminary enquiry and presumably relying upon the statements recorded therein a discharge order was passed against Respondent I, which requires to be noted in extenso.

"OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL ENGINEER (SLUMS) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY No. D/608/SE(S)/11/89 Dated 29/7/1981 Shri Parveen Kumar Jain, N.T.S., is hereby informed that his services are not required in th







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top