SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 556

J.S.VERMA, S.P.KURDUKAR, V.N.KHARE
Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
Sheshrao – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) SHESHRAO, Respondent 1, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Thanegaon, Tahsil Karanja, District Wardha. A motion of no confidence was moved against him which was passed by majority of the panchas in a meeting held on 8/3/1995. Respondent 1 challenged the same by raising a dispute under the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 before the Additional Collector of the District who rejected the same on 21/4/1995. Respondent 1 then preferred an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner which was allowed by order dated 22/1/1996 on the ground of want of a valid notice. The effect of the order was that the motion of no confidence was treated to be invalid. Thereafter, another motion of no confidence was moved by 8 out of 11 panchas on 3/2/1996. The motion was passed by an overwhelming majority of the panchas on 9/2/1996. Respondent 1 then raised a dispute before the Additional Collector who rejected the same. An appeal to the Divisional Commissioner by respondent 1has been allowed by the order dated 14/8/1996. The appellant who is one of the panchas filed a writ petition in the High court challenging the Commissioners order. That writ petition has been






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top