SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 571

A.S.ANAND, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Dilip Kumar Basu – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


ORDER

Learned amicus curiae, Dr. Singhvi, Senior Advocate, has filed a chart detailing "comparative compliance reports" from various States and Union Territories on the basis of the affidavits submitted by them. According to the chart, it is seen that the affidavits furnished by various States/Union Territories are still deficient and do not furnish full and complete information up-to-date. By way of an example, we have seen the affidavit filed on behalf of the State of Assam as also the NCT of Delhi. Learned counsel appearing for the States are directed to furnish a meaningful response with all details in respect of the 11 directions given in D. K. Basu v. State of W. B. ((1997) 1 SCC 416 : 1997 SCC (Cri) 92) as well as the information which has been found to be deficient in the chart filed by Dr. Singhvi. In some of the States/Union Territories, it appears that in respect of the custodial deaths, inquiries have been initiated under Section 176 CrPC but the reports of inquiries are not available. All those States are required to file affidavits through the Home Secretary of the State concerned, indicating the status of all those inquiries and wherever reports have been received, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top