SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 187

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.B. Pattanaik, G. N. Ray
SANDHYA M. KHANDELWAL, PETITIONER
Versus
MANOJ. M. KHANDELWAL, RESPONDENT.
Transfer Petition (C) No. 21 of 1997,
decided on February 6, 1998.

The court can grant a decree of divorce by treating a pending application as one made under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 if it appears to be beneficial to the interests of both parties.

Headnote:

Divorce - Mutual Consent - Court grants decree of divorce by treating pending application as one made under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Fact of the Case:

Parties settled their disputes mutually and filed a joint petition incorporating the terms of the settlement before the Court. Both parties personally present in court. Affidavits filed containing the terms of the settlement. Prayer made to treat pending divorce petition as one by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Finding of the Court:

The terms of settlement are beneficial to the interests of both parties and the minor son. Court directs for a decree of divorce by treating the pending application as one made under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Transfer petition disposed of in terms of the settlement.

Issues: Settlement of disputes, mutual consent divorce, application of Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the terms of settlement were beneficial to the interests of both parties and the minor son, and therefore directed for a decree of divorce by treating the pending application as one made under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Final Decision: Decree of divorce granted by treating the pending application as one made under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

ORDER

1. During the pendency of this Transfer Petition No. 21 of 1997 before this Court, both the parties have tried to settle their disputes and it is stated by the learned counsel for both the parties that the parties have settled their disputes mutually and a joint petition incorporating the terms of the settlement has been filed before this Court. The parties are also personally present in court today. Both the parties have also filed affidavits in support of the application containing the terms of the settlement. It has been indicated in the said terms of settlement that such settlement has been arrived at voluntarily and keeping in mind the interests of both the parties and the minor son. It appears to us that the terms of settlement are beneficial to the interests of both the parties and also the interests of the minor son. A prayer has also been made before us as contained in the terms of settlement that the divorce petition bearing Case No. 134 of 1996 pending before the Family Court at Ajmer may be treated as a divorce petition by mutual consent under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and a decree of divorce be granted. As it appears to us that in the facts of the case, such decree of divorce will be beneficial to the interests of both the parties, we direct for a decree of divorce by treating the pending application as an application made under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

2. The transfer petition stands disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the terms of the settlement affirmed by both the parties will form part of this order.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top