SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 282

S.P.BHARUCHA, B.N.KIRPAL
Bhagwant Kishore Sud – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chandigarh – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant impugns the order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh whereby his writ petition was dismissed.

2. The appellant, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961 disclosed income from 14 trucks under a voluntary disclosure scheme. That scheme, it is submitted, made provisions prohibiting the use of disclosures thereunder in subsequent assessment proceedings. The disclosure made by the assessee was accepted on 31-3-1966. On 28-2-1973, the ITO issued a reassessment order under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, pertaining to Assessment Years 1959-60 to 1962-63 and brought to tax additional amounts which, he held, were income from trucks. The assessee appealed and contended that the ITO had no power to invoke the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act relating to the said assessment years because his disclosures under the voluntary disclosure scheme were protected. Not only did the Appellate Assistant Commissioner reject the appeal but, after notice, enhanced the amount found by the ITO to have been income which had escaped assessment.

3. The assessee thereupon appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. On 22-5-1975, the assessee wrote to







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top