SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 418

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B. L. Hansaria, G.N. Ray
DR H. PHUNINDRE SINGH AND OTHERS, APPEALLANT
Versus
K. K. SETHI AND ANOTHER, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeal No. ... of 1996 (Arising out of SLP No. 26786 of 1995),
decided on February 19, 1996.

Enforcement of Court's order and disposal of contempt petition within a specified period.

Headnote:

Contempt - Disposal of Contempt Petition - Enforcement of Court's Order

Fact of the Case:

The court considered the failure to dispose of a contempt petition despite the order not being stayed by the Division Bench, and the need to consider deliberate violation of the subsisting order of the Court.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the contempt petition should have been disposed of on merits instead of being adjourned till the disposal of the appeal, and ordered that it should be disposed of within three months from the date of the communication of the order.

Issues: Failure to dispose of contempt petition, enforceability of the Court's order, and adjournment till disposal of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to consider deliberate violation of the subsisting order of the Court and ensure the enforceability of the Court's order by disposing of the contempt petition within a specified period.

Final Decision: The court ordered the disposal of the contempt petition within three months from the date of the communication of the order and directed that the pending appeal should not be taken up for hearing before the disposal of the contempt petition.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In our view, in the facts of the case, particularly when the order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court was not stayed by the Division Bench, the contempt petition should have been disposed of on merits instead of adjourning the same till disposal of the appeal, so that question of deliberate violation of the subsisting order of the Court is considered and enforceability of the Courts order is not permitted to be diluted. In the facts of the case, we feel that the contempt petition should be disposed of within a period of three months from the date of the communication of this order and we order accordingly. It is further directed that before disposal of the contempt petition, the pending appeal should not be taken up for hearing. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top