SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1025

B. N. KIRPAL, J. S. VERMA
Collector Of Central Excise, Indore: Collector Of Central Excise, Jaipur – Appellant
Versus
Partap Steel Rolling Mills: Kec International LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

1. These appeals are against the decision of the Tribunal. We find that the requisite facts on the basis of which the controversy between the parties relating to exigibility of the goods to excise duty arose have not been recorded either by the Tribunal or any of the authorities below it. It is appropriate that in respect of each item or goods for which excise duty has been demanded, there should be a clear finding of fact about the nature of the process and of the end product (sic) by which the goods comes into existence, to enable a decision on the point whether the goods are exigible to excise duty. The appropriate course, therefore, is to remit these matters to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in accordance with law.

2. We direct accordingly. The appeals are allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top