SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1188

M.M.PUNCHHI, S.P.KURDUKAR
Divisional Forest Officer – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted. Heard learned counsel.

2. This appeal arises out of an order dated 11-11-1988 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Civil Writ Petition No. 5039 of 1988 dismissing the writ petition of the appellant in limine.

3. The appellant herein is the Divisional Forest Officer, Timber Extension Division, Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, in charge of the Sales Depot at Nangal which is within the State of Punjab. The appellant is a registered dealer, as the expression is known to the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). During the relevant assessment year, the appellant transacted more than one sale in favour of the respondent Punjab Export Corporation Ltd., Chandigarh, a government corporation. The appellant required of the buyer-Corporation to supply him declarations under Form ST XXII in order to claim statutory deduction. By then winding-up proceedings were on. An official liquidator stood appointed. The official liquidator instead of supplying those forms issued a certificate verifying the sales. But since this did not satisfy the legal requirements, the claim of the appellant for deduction was negatived by the assessing au

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top