SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1121

M.K.MUKHERJEE, K.T.THOMAS
Bholaprasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORDER

1. The appellant and seven others were placed on trial before an Additional Sessions Judge of Chandrapur on the allegations that on 2-1-1990 at or about 8.00 a.m. they committed rioting on Chandrapur Tadoba Road and, in course thereof, the murder of Alakh Niranjan. On conclusion of the trial the learned Judge convicted the appellant under Section 302 IPC (simpliciter), while acquitting the other seven. As the appeal preferred by the appellant in the High Court proved abortive he has filed the instant appeal after obtaining special leave.

2. To bring home the charges levelled against the appellant and, for that matter, the other accused persons, the prosecution rested its case upon the testimonies of, besides the doctor who held the post-mortem examination and other formal witnesses, Brijendra Pande (PW 3), brother of the deceased, who gave an ocular version of the incident and upon the dying declaration of Alakh Niranjan (Ex. 62) recorded by the Investigating Officer in the hospital in presence of a doctor. In describing the role played by the appellant, PW 3 specifically stated that he gave two knife blows on the left side of the chest of Alakh Niranjan which resulted in his





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top