SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 278

G.T.NANAVATI, S.C.AGRAWAL
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Khalsa Travels – Respondent


ORDER

1. These appeals filed by the State of Rajasthan raise questions relating to the constitutional validity of Section 4-B(3) of the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") and Rule 4-CC of the Rajasthan Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules") which make provision for levy of special road tax on a transport vehicle which is used without a valid permit or in any manner not authorised by the permit. By the impugned judgments the High Court has held that Section 4-B(3) is ultra vires the legislative powers conferred on the State Legislature and that Rule 4-CC which has been made to effectuate the said provision was also ultra vires the rule-making powers conferred on the State Government under the Act.

2. According to the High Court the imposition, though described as a tax, is, in substance, a fine for an alleged offence of plying the vehicle without a valid permit or in contravention of the conditions of permit and such a penalty cannot be treated as a part of regulatory or compensatory tax. On that view, the High Court has declared that Section 4-B(3) of the Act is ultra vires the powers conferred on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top