SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 507

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
N. D. Ojha, S. Ranganathan
FELDOHF AUTO & GAS INDUSTRIES LTD., AND ANOTHER, APPELLANTS
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER, RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeal No. 3851 of 1991 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 9721 of 1991.),
decided on September 23, 1991.

The appellants were allowed to pursue the validity of the notification in the writ petition, while being directed to address other assessment details in regular appeals under the Act.

Headnote:

Notification No. 174/89 - Writ Petition - The court allowed the appeal and restored the writ petition to be disposed of by the High Court in regard to the point of validity in the notification, while directing the appellants to agitate other points concerning details of the assessment in the regular appeals under the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants on the ground of not availing the alternative remedy of appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the appeal and restored the writ petition to be disposed of by the High Court in regard to the point of validity in the notification, while directing the appellants to agitate other points concerning details of the assessment in the regular appeals under the Act.

Issues: Dismissal of writ petition for not availing alternative remedy of appeal, validity of Notification No. 174/89

Ratio Decidendi: The contention that the appellants had challenged the validity of Notification No. 174/89 in the writ petition and this contention would not be open to them in the appeal under the statutory provisions was found to have force.

Final Decision: The civil appeal was allowed and the writ petition was restored to be disposed of by the High Court in regard to the point of validity in the notification, while directing the appellants to agitate other points concerning details of the assessment in the regular appeals under the Act.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. We have heard counsel for both the parties. The High Court has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants on the short ground that the petitioners have not availed themselves of the alternative remedy of appeal. It is pointed out on behalf of the appellants that they had challenged the validity of Notification No. 174/89 dated 1-9-1989 in the writ petition and this is a contention which will not be open to them in the appeal under the statutory provisions. There is force in this contention. We, therefore, allow the appeal and restore the writ petition to be disposed of by the High Court in regard to the point of validity in the notification. The other points concerning details of the assessment, if any, should, however, be agitated by the appellants in the regular appeals under the Act, if any.

3. The civil appeal is disposed of accordingly. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top