SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 1660

D.P.WADHWA, SUJATA V.MANOHAR
A. P. State Road Trasport Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Kaiser Begum – Respondent


JUDGMENT :- Leave granted in both the matters.

2. The facts in both the appeals are similar. For the sake of convenience we are referring to the facts in C.A. arising from S.L.P. (C) No. 16621/97.

3. Husband of the respondent, who was a driver with the appellant-Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, died in harness on 27-10-1992. On 11th January, 1994 the respondent submitted an application for appointment as an Attender on compassionate grounds. Under Circular dated 13th July, 1988 issued by the Corporation, a provision is made for considering spouse/children of employees who have died in harness for recruitment on compassionate grounds. The Circular prescribes minimum qualifications for the candidates seeking appointment on compassionate grounds. In Clause (1) of the Circular it is further provided that the spouse or one child of an employee who has died in harness can be considered for appointment if (i) none of the children or spouse of the employee who has so died, is already employed; (ii) the candidate is in possession of the requisite qualifications as prescribed in Recruitment Regulations and (iii) there is a sanctioned vacancy. Clause 8 of the Circular further pr




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top