SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 209

K.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, G.N.RAY
Ibp Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Bal Kishan Mittal – Respondent


Advocates:
Latha Mathur, MALA NARAYAN, MINAKSHI ARORA, P.C.Chidambaram, P.N.PURI, S.M.Sarin

JUDGMENT

G.N. Ray, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Pursuant to the notice issued on the special leave petition out of which this appeal arises the respondent has appeared through a counsel and counter-affidavit has been filed. This appeal is directed against the decision dated May 18, 1992 passed by a single Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in R.S.A. No. 228 of 1992 by which the said appeal preferred by the appellants was summarily dismissed at the stage of admission. The said R.S.A. No. 228 of 1992 arose out of a decision passed by the learned District Judge, Bhiwani, on August 26, 1991 in Civil Appeal No. 22 of 1991 whereby the said appeal was allowed and Civil Suit No. 468 of 1985 was decreed by the learned District Judge. The respondent filed the said Civil Suit No. 468 of 1985 for permanent and mandatory injunction directing the defendants in the said suit who are the appellants in this appeal to the effect that the said defendants should not give effect to the order contained in the letter No. 0.17(a), dated April 29, 1986 by which a decision was taken to discontinue the supply of kerosene/LDO to the said plaintiff/respondent with effect from June 1, 1986 and not to reduce







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top