ORDER

1. The Office Report and also the affidavit of dasti service would prove that respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4 have been served by usual mode and respondent Nos. 3, 5, 6 and 7 refused to receive notice even by dasti. Under these circumstances the service in the S.L.P. is complete. When the case was called, no one appeared for them, nor did they appear in person.

2. Leave granted Heard learned counsel for the appellants.

3. The appellants are the first party in the reference proceedings Under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act which relates to an extent of Acre 33.09 gunthas of land in Chintagattu village, Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh, acquired due to submersion of Pochampadu Project. After deter mination of compensation, since the appellants claimed l/4th share therein and was objected to by the 2nd party/respondents, the Collector made a reference Under Section 30 and it is now pending a decision therein. The title of the appellants to claim compensation is based on the entries in the record of rights, revenue records to show pre-existing title. They sought to prove it by filing copies of family holdings, khasra Pahnin and Pahni Patrikas for the year 1954-55 and Certified Co