S.SAGHIR AHMAD, S.RAJENDRA BABU, B.N.KIRPAL
X – Appellant
Versus
Hospital Z – Respondent
(1) WRIT Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution against the judgment already passed by this court cannot be entertained. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr. X v. Hospital Z (1998) 8 SCC 296 may be deleted. This prayer shall accordingly be deleted. So also, the other prayers which indirectly concern the correctness of the judgment already passed shall stand deleted. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petition may not be treated as a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution but may be treated as an application for clarification/ directions in the case already decided by this Court, viz. Mr. X v. Hospital Z (C.A. No. 4641/1998).
(2) WE direct that the office shall not treat this as a writ petition filed under Article 32, but shall register it separately as an IA for clarification/directions in C.A. No. 4641/1998.
(3) NOTICE of this I.A. returnable within two weeks shall be issued to National Aids Control Organisation, Union of India and Indian Medical Association which is already represented in IA No. 2-3. Notice shall also go to Medical
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.