SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 746

K.T.THOMAS, R.P.SETHI
Rajinder And Company – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) WE cannot appreciate why the High Court had interfered with that part of the order passed by the trial court appointing a Commission for inspecting the site and to file a report and to measure the work done by the respondent. The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the respondent will not be made responsible for the cost or expenses which may be involved in the Commission to file the report. The question whether the Commissioners report is finally acceptable or not would be decided by the Court dehors the order passed by the authority concerned. In the light of the said innocuous position it was not necessary for the High Court to alter the trial courts order. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order of the High Court and restore the order of the trial court in full measure, with the rider that this action will be without prejudice to the right of the parties to substantiate the respective contentions regarding the tenability or untenability of the Commissioners report and its conclusions.

(3) THE appeal is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top