SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 406

D.P.MOHAPATRA, J.JAGANNADHA RAO
Batakrushna Das – Appellant
Versus
Natabar Behera – Respondent


J.JAGANNADHA RAO, J.

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE High Court in Second Appeal has set aside the judgment of the First Appellate Court and restored the judgment and decree of the trial Court.

(3) LEARNED counsel for the appellant submits that the High Court has not framed any substantial question of law and has proceeded to dispose of the Second Appeal and it has reversed the judgment of the Appellate Court.

(4) ACCORDING to the judgments of this Court, it is mandatory for the High Court to frame a substantial question of law and then only to consider whether the appellant has a good case on the said question of law. As this has not been done, we set aside the judgment of the High Court and remit the matter to the High Court for fresh disposal for framing a substantial question of law and disposing of the appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure in accordance with law. We make it clear that we are not to be understood as having said anything on the merits of the case.

(5) THE appeal is accordingly remitted to the High Court. We request the High Court to take up the matter at an early date, preferably within three months

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top