SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 38

S.P.KURDUKAR, R.P.SETHI
Tata Finance LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Ajaya Kumar Biswal – Respondent


(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(3) THE appellant is Tata Finance Limited which had given the truck to the 1st respondent under a hire-purchase agreement dated 4/1/1995. Under the said agreement the respondent was to pay a sum of Rs. 15,000.00 (fifteen thousand) per month as hire charges in addition to the additional deposit of Rs 89,030. The regular and timely payment of hire charges was the essence of the contract and in the event of breach of any such payment the appellants were entitled to claim back the hired vehicle and also demand the balance money after giving due notice. It appears that the 1st respondent had committed breach of this agreement. Several cheques issued by him towards hire charges were dishonoured by the bankers due to insufficient funds in his account. Several letters were addressed by the appellant to the said respondent but the amounts were not paid. Finally on 5/9/1997 the appellant called upon the 1st respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs and 20 thousand which had become due and payable under the agreement or return the truck. After expiry of the said period under the letter dated 5/9/1997 and because




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top