SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(SC) 303

A.P.MISRA, N.S.HEGDE
R. Kanthimathi – Appellant
Versus
Beatrice Xavier – Respondent


(1) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. The question raised in this appeal is an interesting question and of some importance. The question is: "Whether on the execution of agreement to sell, by the landlord with the tenant and landlord having received substantial portion of the sale consideration, the relationship of landlord-tenant inter se between them ceases and fresh rights and obligations flows under this agreement?"

(2) THE present appeal is by the tenant who received decree of eviction against him by the order of trial Court confirmed by the appellate authority and finally affirmed by the High Court. The respondent landlord filed a suit for eviction on the ground of wilful default and also of committing an act of waste under Section 10(2)(i)and 10(2)(iii) of the Tamil Nadu Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. Her case is that though that tenant paid rent regularly upto March, 1977, but thereafter did not pay rent regularly. But on request of the tenant-appellants to the landlady she agreed to sell the disputed premises, as a consequence, the agreement of sale was executed on 4-5-1977. According to the landlady, a breach was committed by the appella











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top